|
Facts About Fuel -Part 2 The following is by Don Nix,
founder and former owner of POWERMASTER FUEL. Which Oil is Better - Synthetic or
Castor? Before we get started on the subject
heading, I ’d like to offer a couple more thoughts on last month ’s subject,
“What ’s the Oil Content?” -- thoughts that have been remembered since writing
the original column: Many modelers who have been involved
in the hobby for a long time, including those who’ve been away for years and
recently returned, are very stubbornly remembering when model fuel just about
had to contain something in the order of 25%oil -usually all- castor. They have
a hard time dealing with the idea that virtually no one runs that much oil any
more in modern engines. The operative word here, of course,
is “modern.” The metallurgy in today’s engines barely resembles that of a
generation ago. The end result, as far as model engines are concerned, is that
the engines today simply don ’t require as much lubricant -not nearly as much.
I will be quick to add that those running antique engines in Old Timer events
should certainly continue to use the old time formulas -no doubt about it. In addition to vastly improved
metallurgy, we must remember than manufacturing techniques barely resemble
those from years ago, in many ways. Modern CNC machinery has made it possible
to routinely and cheaply make 1 or 1 million parts all exactly alike. Those of you who have come along in
later years may be shocked to know that up until the advent of this new
technology, every piston was hand fitted to every liner. There was no such
thing as simply machining 1,000 pistons and 1,000 sleeves, picking one from
each batch and having them fit. The belief in those days that some
engines of the same size and make were markedly hotter than others was no doubt
true. We’ve read that in those days, a .29 for example, might vary from as low
as an actual .26 to a .32 –some 23% more displacement! More closely controlled
tolerances have resulted in the ability to use much different fuels than a
generation ago. The second thought on the subject of
total oil content came from reading the operating instructions included with a
new imported 4-stroke engine –the DAMO FS 218 twin. It recommends a fuel
containing 94% methanol, 5% nitro and 1% castor oil! Clearly, this reinforces
my point that “there ain’t no such thing as a fixed percentage of oil content.”
Now --on to this month ’s subject. Before we depart the subject of oil
in model fuel, let’s talk about a point that’s argued vehemently all over the
land - Which kind of oil is better –synthetic or castor? Each side has its very
strong proponents, and each side is right ….to a point. “Old-timers ” tend to
still favor an all-castor fuel, or at least one containing a liberal amount of
castor oil. Modelers who have come to the hobby in the last 15 or 20 years have
a strong affection for synthetic oils, or at least want their fuel to have
mostly synthetics. Let’s take a look at both types statistically: I’d like to insert here that there
is a “Chicken Little … The Sky Is Falling ” rumor making the rounds of the
Internet these days that the manufacturers of castor oil have recently changed
their methods of making the product, and the castor oil we are getting now is
either wholly or partially incompatible with methanol. I have talked at some length with
the “Head Techie ” of one of the largest castor oil importers in the U.S., and
I want to go on record as saying that, according to the best information I can
find, This is total B.S. The Head Techie actually laughed out loud when I told
him what was going around. He said, “You know, there isn’t much we do to the
stuff. We press the oil out, filter it, grade it and package it. As far as I
know, nothing has changed.” It apparently started with one of the fuel
manufacturers. For what reason, I have no idea, unless it’s to help them
promote their proprietary synthetics. Incidentally, I have read a response on
the net from SIG, agreeing with the fact that it’s nonsense. So …..there you have it. “You pays your
money and takes your choice.” Actually, it ’s a little better than that, and
the obvious answer is -use a combination of the two, in proportions that will
come nearest to enjoying the benefits of each, while minimizing the adverse
characteristics. A few years back, the modeling
community was in a “synthetic oil frenzy,” and the swing was toward
all-synthetic fuels. Happily -at least in this writer’s opinion, we’ve seen a
very noticeable swing back toward the center, with the majority seeming to prefer
a synthetic/castor blend. We think this makes sense, and many years experience
proves it. The most frequent comment I hear
from lovers of all-synthetic fuels is, “Brand XX leaves a lot less oil on my
model.” My response to that is, “Doesn’t that bother you? If you don ’t see
much oil on your model after flying, that tells you one of two things -or both:
Either there wasn’t enough oil in there in the first place, or the oil is
burning off with the methanol. Neither is good. There’s no way oil can burn off
and properly lubricate at the same time.” This is usually met with a puzzled
look, then one of the light dawning, having just realized something they never
thought of before. Oil residue in model engines is a natural as barking is to a
dog. We have to learn to live with it. As an aside, not long back a friend
sent me a copy of an article published in a European model magazine. In one
part, the writer stated, “The Americans are the only ones rich enough and dumb
enough to use synthetic oils.” Perhaps overstated just a bit, but it has some
validity. There a couple of types of engines
that do require an all-castor fuel, or at least one with a considerably higher
castor content than most others. One would be the Fox ringed iron piston type,
and the other would be the small Cox engines, because of their rather unique
ball-and-socket connecting rod-to-piston design. Pattern flyers traditionally prefer
an all-synthetic fuel, for a couple of reasons, I think. One is the fact that
pattern flyers practice a lot -hour after hour after hour. That much use, plus
the tuned pipe setup that is almost universal with them probably, tends to
cause a greater problem with varnish and carbon buildup than in sport types.
(At the risk of bombarded, I also think it ’s largely a state of mind.“ Joe
Champion uses all-synthetic, so that’s what I ’m going to use.”) The other area where we have seen
all-synthetic fuels gain in popularity in recent years has been with model
helicopters, probably for the same reasons. Also, the trend toward 30% nitro
fuel for serious competition has led to using a lower viscosity lubricant, and,
as shown in the comparison charts above, this necessarily dictates using
synthetics. Next installment: Nitromethane –the
“mystery ” ingredient. |